Everton Rumours Archive January 26 2018

 

Use our rumours form to send us everton transfer rumours.

26 Jan 2018 14:45:13
Dendonker has been offered to Everton but WHU also siffing.
Brst scenario would be to buy and loan back.

Believable3 Unbelievable0

{Ed002's Note - Why would Everton buy to loan back?}

26 Jan 2018 17:40:06
Ed do we have any real intrest in dendonker and is the lad any good plus if he where to sign for us do u think it would mean we would offload say schniderlin which wouldn't be a great loss in my opinion.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - RTP.}

26 Jan 2018 22:36:20
What’s RTP?

Agree2 Disagree0

{Ed025's Note - its ..read the posts ST, your one the chosen ones mate, its usually RTFP.. :)

27 Jan 2018 08:14:31
WTFAYTAEd.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed025's Note - im talking about codes degs.. :)

27 Jan 2018 11:04:00
Lol thanks Ed too many acronyms and abbreviations in the world these days and text speak is like a whole new language! 😱.

Agree0 Disagree0

{Ed025's Note - i know ST, us old fuddy duddys cant keep up mate.. :)

27 Jan 2018 12:47:26
I really hate TLA's. ;-)

Agree2 Disagree0

26 Jan 2018 11:13:30
i have been a strong supporter of sam but its getting hard to defend him, if we end this window without a left back and minus lookman i think i might cry.
i understand lookman is young an loses the ball a lot and i agree with sam he isn't ready to start games but he is creative and could be massive off the bench when needed this year and maybe starting games next year.

Believable2 Unbelievable0

26 Jan 2018 11:37:57
I agree Johny, he was great when he came on at Anfield in the FA Cup, he can have a good impact coming off the bench in the second half, can't understand why we would be looking to let him go. as for left back, our poor recruitment policy is to blame for that. Do any of the eds know whether our wage bill could be a problem for us with FFP? I was shocked to learn Sandro is on 120k a week and we now have a lot of players on 100k+ per week, its a big jump in the space of 18 months - 2 years?

Agree2 Disagree0

{Ed002's Note - Without seeing this years figures I don't know.}

26 Jan 2018 11:43:57
If losing the ball is the reason for loaning Lookman out, he would need to get rid of the bulk of the team with what we have witnessed this season.
I agree with you, we need to keep him as an impact player coming off the bench, and we definitely still need a LB. Garbutt looked ok the other night, however he was playing against children, literally.

Agree6 Disagree0

26 Jan 2018 11:53:55
Does the sponsor of finch Farm come into account as we got 30+ million for it and will contribute to wage bill.

Agree0 Disagree0

26 Jan 2018 12:26:49
Lookman losing the ball surely shouldn’t prevent him from having game time. Shove at left back as he can’t lose the ball as much as the current option we have there.

Agree3 Disagree0

26 Jan 2018 13:36:26
Maybe he loses the ball too much because he doesn't have an outlet to pass to, therefore keeping it too long. Once we have a balanced/ settled 18 that can perform week in/ week out, then we can start to make decisions on who should stay or go.

Agree4 Disagree0

 
Change Consent