Everton rumours 15582

 

Use our rumours form to send us everton transfer rumours.



13 Jul 2017 10:02:31
Guardian reporting we've bid 40mill for glyfi and that he will NOT be travelling with the Swansea squad to the U. S today, everton hopeful of pushing a deal through.

be great that.

Agree2 Disagree2

13 Jul 2017 10:21:27
now confirmed by Swansea, looks like this one could finally be happening.

13 Jul 2017 10:30:55
Sky saying they have rejected offer.

13 Jul 2017 10:37:33
It does seem that this deal has legs, but it also seems that we'll have to propose a deal comprising a basic fee and add-ons that'll come to around the overall amount wanted by Swansea City. I don't mind them playing hard-ball regarding the fee - after all, that's what we did with the likes of Stones, Lukaku, etc.

13 Jul 2017 10:55:28
Completely agree they can demand the fee they want for the player but 50m seems a crazy fee for him. Feels like we could get better value for that money than what Sigurdson can offer.

Just because we have the money doesn't necessarily mean we should spend it because we can.

13 Jul 2017 11:08:36
Agree that 50 mill seems a bit steep but this is the one transfer that could make all the difference.

{Ed025's Note - its very high for me lee, maybe a player plus cash deal would suit both parties as we have a few we need to offload mate..

13 Jul 2017 11:15:41
I think we are being hit with a w@:ker tax no matter the target. We know Gylfi suits the premier league. Its a lot but we over pay now get a decent league position it gets easier next few years. Did I say its not my cash so I will gladly spend it.

{Ed025's Note - its not like we are very fair when it comes to selling tallaght, the money we got for the likes of fellaini, rooney, lescott, stones and now rom we cant have many complaints mate..

13 Jul 2017 12:35:48
Player plus cash would be ideal Ed but I think they're holding out for the big money. Either way, I think this one needs to happen.

13 Jul 2017 12:53:45
50 for Stones
50 for Sigurdsson
Steep but fair.

13 Jul 2017 13:03:35
Didnt they want Besic when we signed him?

13 Jul 2017 14:00:49
Need to look past the transfer fee, is he going to improve us? Yes . Lad is quality . coyb.

13 Jul 2017 13:40:50
Same sort of deal we did for Lukaku I think, apparently Sig hasn't travelled as he is not in the right frame of mind due to uncertainty over his future, to me this is a deal that will be struck and in essence signal the end of any hopes for Ross. I will be over the moon with this signing the fella adds a new dimension to our attack, another striker/ target man and a natural left sided midfielder and I believe we will have a very good squad to compete next season.

13 Jul 2017 13:49:24
Will be in an Everton shirt now he has withdrawn from the tour, just a little tweak on the fee, Swansea will sell now probs 42 Million with adds on taking price to £50 Million, be shocked if this deal does not go through now.

13 Jul 2017 13:55:07
Proven in prem! Decent scorer at his club usually important goals as well! Dead ball specialist! 3rd highest in league for assists last year! Can win a game with a moment of individual magic!
Imo worth every penny of £50m
We have to remember Raheem Sterling cost that just because he runs fast!

13 Jul 2017 16:38:24
Read something other day about is GS worth the money being touted for him

Basically it broke down his last season and it's not as good as stats make us believe.

Apparently he is not known for his defensive qualities, so scratch that from his game.

About four or more goals were from pens

Think it's around half his assists from dead ball situations.

It basically said that if you take them off his stats record he is below avarage player for his position.

Turning 28 so a 4 year contract, although gets his so called prime years leave us with no real Sell on value.

And I know people say he got no game time, but he went to a better team than Swansea and couldn't break into there first team, must be a reason, he not going to be the best in training then dropped on match day!

I know it's not our money, and personally if we going to throw that at him so be it, but for that amount I don't believe that there is no one else out there SW has had scouted that couldn't cost less, be younger and have the same or even better qualities than GS.

I thought we brought him in for his eye for quality outside the Prem, who can adapt to the prem life style.

If he comes so be it, hopefully he is brilliant for us, but reading between the lines I'm not impressed with our pursuit of him.

What would Leicester want for mahrez?

13 Jul 2017 18:07:39
yeh but he is a runner with a good engine and defenders have to watch all the time and this makes space for other efc attackers with better stats so despite him lacking in certain aspects his energy opens games, and all players have holes in their game, look at rom .

13 Jul 2017 19:35:58
Doesn't need defensive qualities as that is why we play with both Gana and Schneiderlein, take away his dead ball assists? Erm why? Is that like Martinez comments on goals from corners not being real goals? How many times did we waste corners last season because the taker couldn't clear the first man?

This fella brings us a new attacking dimension and sell on value is irrelevant as we ain't buying to sell, we are buying to improve, is Kyle Walker worth £50mill? Yes he is because that's the price Spurs want to sell, its now a sellers market as the money in the Prem now with the T.V deal is astronomical.

13 Jul 2017 20:14:53
That's what I'm asking though BG, will he bring that much, think you read what I said the wrong way.

And we do need defensive qualities cause the best teams defend as a team.

Everyone raves about his stats, and as said stats don't give a full picture, when you break the stats down straight away 4 or more goals are pens, LB takes are pens there fore GS brings 4 less goals, didn't Barkley get 5?







 

 

 
Log In or Register to post

User
Pass
Remember me

Forgot Pass