30 Aug 2026 10:31:55
Ndiaye being sold to Spuds and we get Ricarlisson in a seperate deal. Depending on figures involved I can be ok with that. Beto to be sold for a RB that's not Tete?
30 Aug 2026 10:40:46
Spurs are a bad lot. Why would anyone go there.
30 Aug 2026 10:47:38
If we sell him to Spurs and get Richy, then we are bigger idiots than everyone thought. That is the dumbest idea ever. Richy is finished, always injured, and he has a touch like Barry. He isn't what we need.
30 Aug 2026 10:47:44
Well N'Diaye might be good for them, he's been in a few relegation battles.
30 Aug 2026 10:49:46
Imo, this would be one of the most pathetic deals in the club's history, so they get our best player and we get a cast off we sold to them. Right, ok, no thanks.
30 Aug 2026 10:57:33
Ndiaye obviously wants to leave and we need a forward who can also play off the left and knows the Premier League, plus make some money. Seems a no brainer.
30 Aug 2026 10:58:48
I don't understand why anybody on this site would be satisfied with Richarlison, Danso or most players that wear a Spurs shirt. With the exception of Sarr and Bergvall, who they would never sell and we do not require. Spurs are terrible and we shouldn't be doing any business with them at any cost.
30 Aug 2026 11:06:36
Spilts opinion, obviously. I for one am not too disappointed. Richy belongs in an Everton shirt, and even half fit can be more effective than B or B.
Ndayie is a great player to watch, but does not produce as much as he should.
This deal should mean we can also add a couple more and overall have a stronger squad.
30 Aug 2026 11:12:14
We need a forward who can play off the left is right, but we don't need a player who is injured all the time and never plays, and his best days are behind him. Sell Ndiaye and sign Sarr from Palace. That sounds more like a good deal to me.
30 Aug 2026 11:17:38
You would be happy with that, a half fit player joining our club just because he used to play for us. That's been our problem for years, bringing players back to finish their careers just because they played for us in the past. I thought we had grown out of that nonsense. It never works, always a bad idea.
30 Aug 2026 11:33:41
We can have a different viewpoint, Dino. I'm happy to see him back.
30 Aug 2026 11:34:08
What you're getting, Dino, is a player that knows the club and fans, scores goals, brings others into the game and can work with a second striker. He wasn't injured much last year, and most players get injuries throughout the season.
Ili going means we have the money to improve in a number of areas, and go e is real depth. He's a good player, but we need numbers right now, and it's a simple sacrifice.
30 Aug 2026 11:34:20
Sell Ndiaye and bring Grealish if you must, but not Richarlison. My thoughts were sell him to City (no longer interested) and bring in both.
30 Aug 2026 11:38:47
Totally with you, Dino, on these points. Again, similar to Armstrong, if we are to lose none our best players, it can't be to Spurs. Not only is it a poor deal, it screams mediocre and lack of ambition.
30 Aug 2026 11:42:57
Depends how we spend the money, I'd say. Ndayie's output is not irreplaceable. One player out, 3 or 4 in. Better squad.
30 Aug 2026 11:44:28
I hope you guys are right, and I am wrong for the club's sake, and you're spot on. Even if Richy had one leg, he would be better than Barry for my sanity. We can't have him as our striker all season; it was so hard to watch him last season. Can't go through that again.
30 Aug 2026 11:49:45
I'm divided over the deal. I hope this doesn't mean we ain't looking for another striker. Ille wants to go, fair enough, but I'm shocked it's to Spurs. Thought it would be a Champions League team at least. I don't mind Richie returning tho, just hope he isn't injured all the time!