10 Sep 2015 09:36:48
Daily Mail "John stones wants new contract with a £38million buy out clause in it. Wont sign it unless his terms are met" Ermmm he has a 4 year deal left with no clause in. why print such a b******* report haha we don't need to give him a new contract with his terms hahaha he has a 4 year deal left. why would we pay him more money and include a buy out clause so he can double his wage for a few months then move to Chelsea for the so called £38million. Love the media when they talk about us
10 Sep 2015 11:57:16
That did cross my mind this morning too, do the daily fail not know how business works, in negotiations the two parties reach an agreement where both benefit. There is clearly no benefit to Everton there.
Only way I can see Everton giving him more money with a buy out clause included is if it's for an astronomical figure like 50 million+ so we really would benefit if it's activated. Anyways hoping to smash chelsea in our next game coyb!.
10 Sep 2015 14:38:48
50M buy out clause or no deal. The only way we can keep him however, is if we finish in the top five and he has an incentive to stay, so let's start with a thrashing of chelski and show them who is a small club.
10 Sep 2015 15:25:54
Fore years on his present deal, so a new deal, from the clubs point of view, must inc, an extention, plus a release provision, well in excess of the sum already offered and rejected. So to claim he will only sign a deal with a 38m release, is plain crazy.I know our board and CEO, are the most incompetant in the land, but they are not totally mad.
10 Sep 2015 16:07:08
Agree Mike 50 look good price. Heard Chelsea reached 38 before window closed.
10 Sep 2015 18:20:55
We don't need to make a deal yet he is under contract till 2019. So give him more cash 😂 but we don't need to put buyout clause in. Do it in 2 years. Then he will have played more and be worth more if not we keep.